Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Making Processes
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Improving communication about cancer screening: moving towards informed decision making.
For decades, public communications about cancer screening have used persuasive techniques with the aim of maximising the number of people being screened. However, perspectives have changed more recently to acknowledge that screening can lead to harm as well as benefit, and that it is important for service users to consider both. For some types of cancer screening, there is professional contenti...
متن کاملImproving consistency in AHP decision-making processes
Decision making in engineering is becoming increasingly complex due to the large number of alternatives and multiple conflicting goals. Powerful decisionsupport expert systems powered by suitable software are increasingly necessary. In this paper, the multiple attribute decision method known as analytical hierarchy process (AHP), which uses pairwise comparisons with numerical judgments, is cons...
متن کاملPatient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening
e Context: Decision aids prepare patients to make decisions about healthcare options consistent with their preferences. Helping patients choose among available options for colorectal cancer screening is important because rates are lower than screening for other cancers. This systematic review describes studies evaluating patient decision aids for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adul...
متن کاملInformed Decision-Making and Breast Cancer Screening
In a recent Lancet publication, Hersch et al reported findings on the influence of alternative-content decision aids on knowledge, attitudes, and intentions related to breast cancer screening. The alternative decision aid booklets were provided to 879 women aged 48–50 in New South Wales, Australia who were approaching the target age to begin breast cancer screening. Briefly, the authors randomi...
متن کاملAid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) is a widely recommended yet unproven strategy for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake. Previous trials of decision aids to increase SDM and CRC screening uptake have yielded mixed results. PURPOSE To assess the impact of decision aid-assisted SDM on CRC screening uptake. DESIGN RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS The study was conducted at an ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Maine Medical Center
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2641-2225
DOI: 10.46804/2641-2225.1006